top of page

Risk management and business performance

Evaluating risk management performance is crucial for ensuring that an organization's risk management efforts are effective and efficient. The Kirkpatrick five levels of training evaluation provide a framework for evaluating the effectiveness of training and development programs. In the context of risk management, these levels can be adapted to evaluate the effectiveness of risk management programs.


The McCarthy 4-Mat approach provides a framework for creating effective training and development programs that can be used to improve risk management performance.

Evaluation


The Kirkpatrick five levels of training evaluation include Level 1: Reaction, Level 2: Learning, Level 3: Behavior, Level 4: Results, and Level 5: Return on Investment (ROI). In the context of risk management, the levels can be adapted as follows:

Level 1: Reaction - This level measures the initial reaction of employees to the risk management program. This can be measured through surveys or focus groups to determine whether employees found the program engaging and relevant.

Level 2: Learning - This level measures the extent to which employees have learned the key concepts and skills related to risk management. This can be measured through assessments or tests to determine whether employees understand risk management concepts well.

Level 3: Behavior - This level measures whether employees apply the concepts and skills learned in the risk management program to their work. This can be measured through observation or self-reporting to determine whether employees use risk management practices in their daily work.

Level 4: Results - This level measures the impact of risk management on key performance indicators (KPIs) such as loss frequency and severity, compliance, and customer satisfaction. This can be measured through data analysis to determine whether risk management is positively impacting KPIs.

Level 5: ROI - This level measures the return on investment of the risk management program. This can be measured through a cost-benefit analysis to determine whether the benefits of the risk management program outweigh the costs.

Implementation


The McCarthy 4-Mat approach provides a framework for creating effective training and development programs. The approach comprises four phases: Why, What, How, and What If. In the context of risk management, the phases can be adapted as follows:

Why - This phase involves creating awareness of the need for risk management and building a sense of urgency. This can be done through communication and training programs that highlight the importance of risk management and the potential consequences of not managing risk effectively.

What - This phase involves providing employees with the knowledge and skills they need to manage risk effectively. This can be done through training programs that cover risk management concepts, tools, and techniques.

How - This phase involves allowing employees to practice and apply risk management skills in a safe and supportive environment. This can be done through simulation exercises or real-world scenarios that allow employees to practice risk management skills and receive feedback.

What If - This phase involves exploring alternative risk management approaches and identifying improvement opportunities. This can be done through brainstorming sessions or workshops that encourage employees to think creatively about risk management and identify areas for improvement.


Our View

By using the Kirkpatrick five levels of training evaluation and the McCarthy 4mat approach, organizations can evaluate the effectiveness of their risk management programs and identify opportunities for improvement.


This can help organizations manage risk more effectively, reduce losses, and improve performance. Additionally, it can help organizations demonstrate the value of their risk management programs to key stakeholders, including senior management, regulators, and customers.

Recent Posts

See All

How to Assess a Risk Management Framework

There are many lousy risk management frameworks loose in the wild. Fortunately there are also a lot of excellent risk frameworks. But how do you tell the difference? To assess a risk management framew

How to Build a Lousy Risk Management Framework

A poor-quality risk management framework is just an incident/accident/catastrophe waiting to happen. It can and will undermine an organization's efforts to manage risks effectively and achieve its obj

Components and Indicators of a Risk Framework

A high-quality risk management framework, aligned with ISO 31000 guidelines, involves a well-structured approach that is integrated into all aspects of an organization. Such a framework is comprehensi

Comments


bottom of page